Hi all! I can't tell if I'm missing something, but I'm on level 37 of Route VI (chord progression detection), and I'm seeing the label of a flat VI but I'm wondering why it's called a flat VI (or if this is a mistake)?
In this example below its calling the F major triad the 'flat' VI of Aminor when it's just the VI, right? Thanks!
There are two different conventions when using Roman numeral notation for chord progressions. One labels sharps and flats relative to the key the piece is in. This seems to be the convention you are expecting. Another convention labels sharps and flats relative to the major scale. This is the convention Route VI is using. (Personally, I prefer the latter, as I find it less ambiguous, but YMMV.)
I have finally reached a year of workouts here. WOW I have seen a lot of progress! I am now able to recognize intervals reasonably well, progressions quite well, my melody recognition and memory has improved greatly (from zero to something), my sight singing skills are getting somewhere, and inversions are there to keep me humble. I have learned a ton from the community as well, I want to give a big thank you @everyone!
Good job! Ear training is actually so useful... I also had zero knowledge of it a few years ago, and being able to identify stuff has changed the way I see and make music.
OOOHHHH!!! This would be an amazing feature!! I was struggling with accuracy at the beginning but now the only way for me to see if I was actually singing 100% right notes is to play it right afterwards on the piano
I defiantly do not have that kind of control over my singing, I am using equal as I am a pianist so that is what is in my head. I just mean that I can be singing ti flat which is scale degree of min7 when I should be singing the maj7 and it still gives it to me.
Feb 04, 12:33
Feb 04, 14:51
Feb 04, 18:42